ARWIN REVIEWS
Moonraker poster

Moonraker 1979

★½
Reviewed by Arwin Edward Bagaslao · 2026-02-16
Non spoiler thoughts (summary): Fun action ideas and ambitious production design, but the tension never fully lands. The boat chases and miniature work stand out, especially once the story leans into sci-fi territory, yet constant product placement and convenient gadget solutions weaken the stakes. Performances and tone make the danger feel distant, leaving the climax visually busy but emotionally flat. ⚠️ Spoilers ahead. From here on, plot details are discussed. Read on if you’ve seen the film. If not, save this post and come back after. ⚠️ The opening reminds me of Mission Impossible Fallout with Tom Cruise and Henry Cavill doing a daring skydiving sequence. Some shots look real and shot on location while others look fake like they were filmed in a studio, but that is forgivable given the era. The two high speed boat chase scenes are the highlight for me. Ang daming product placements. It feels like a giant commercial rather than a cinematic experience. I do not know how the studio executives got convinced to green light this. The sets and miniatures in the third act are impressive when the film shifts into sci-fi territory. The production design starts looking like Star Wars. But the climax left me straight faced the whole time. The danger is not felt because it is always convenient that his gadgets or tools solve every sticky situation. The acting did not help either. Richard Kiel looks so creepy. Monstrous but not worthy of screen time for me. His acting feels cringey instead of intimidating. But kudos to his role's character development. The zero gravity acting looks stupid, the main characters stay so calm even if they could die in space, especially Lois Chiles who feels bland. Even after destroying the last globe, they did not feel triumphant either.